The third bullet on your slide about the evidence for natural selection should include that the frequency of predators is decreasing to make it more specific.
It was not easy to understand what your claim was.Also, the end of your reasoning for natural selection when you're talking about the selection against predators is confusing. The graphs were nice and they were easy to understand- Yaya and Sana
It was not easy to understand what your claim was.Also, the end of your reasoning for natural selection when you're talking about the selection against predators is confusing. The graphs were nice and they were easy to understand- Yaya and Sana
Claim for sexual selection should be separate from natural selection as they are different processes. If sexual selection is present there would not necessarily be random mating.
I understand the claims that you were trying to make, however you may want to reword them because they are not easily understood.
ReplyDeleteI think that since this was read online the bullet points should be full sentences instead of thoughts because you are not presenting it.
DeleteClaims could be more clear and thought out
ReplyDeleteI agree
DeleteThe third bullet on your slide about the evidence for natural selection should include that the frequency of predators is decreasing to make it more specific.
ReplyDeleteThe first bullet on your evidence slide for sexual selection is incorrect based on the data
ReplyDeletewill be edited out
Delete"Bright Males are catching up with drab females" unclear
ReplyDeletewill be removed
DeleteIt was not easy to understand what your claim was.Also, the end of your reasoning for natural selection when you're talking about the selection against predators is confusing. The graphs were nice and they were easy to understand- Yaya and Sana
ReplyDeleteThe reasoning for claim 1 does not make complete sense. I understand that you are arguing for natural selection, but your argument is not very strong.
ReplyDeleteIt was not easy to understand what your claim was.Also, the end of your reasoning for natural selection when you're talking about the selection against predators is confusing. The graphs were nice and they were easy to understand- Yaya and Sana
ReplyDeleteThank you, we will clean up our reasons for natural selection
DeleteThe reasoning for claim 1 does not make complete sense. I understand that you are arguing for natural selection, but your argument is not very strong.
ReplyDeleteI understand, we will strengthen our argument by connecting the sexual selection to our natural seletion.
DeleteYour claims for natural selection focus on sexual selection. May need more reasoning for natural selection.
ReplyDeleteClaim for sexual selection should be separate from natural selection as they are different processes. If sexual selection is present there would not necessarily be random mating.
ReplyDeleteAfter rereading sexual selection and natural selection are different. Will be changed in the future.
Delete